Passive Vs. Active: Commodity Investments
December 28, 2009
|
Page 1 of 4
Passive investment has gained broad acceptance as a valid investment choice across a range of asset classes, notably equities and bonds in developed markets. Are the benefits of passive investments transferable to commodities? Providers of index-tracking products cite several key features namely low fees, simplicity and liquidity. Given the 30% decline in commodity markets[1] in the fourth quarter of 2008, are these benefits worth paying that much for? This note looks at whether passive investing is applicable to commodities and whether active managers are a better alternative. Passive Investments Use Fixed Weights To The Largest Traded Commodities Equity indices set weights based on the largest companies – in essence the ‘winners’. In bonds, weights are based on large issuers of debt. For commodity indices, weights are set based on commodities with the largest trading volume or greatest consumption in the global economy. Passive indices set weights generally at the start of the year and drift with price changes through the year. This means that investors are tied to significant exposures to the commodities with the highest use. This typically leads to excessive exposure to energy commodities. Even in the DJUBS index where the exposure to energy is capped to provide a more balanced exposure, just seven commodities account for 61% of the index (crude oil, natural gas, gold, copper, aluminum, corn and soybeans). This means that investors are ‘locked in’ to the returns of just these major commodities. Sugar, one of the best performing commodities this year, has only a 3% weight in the DJ UBS index. Commodity Indices Are Narrowly Focused Passive indices are narrowly focused. The DJUBS index, a commonly used index by trackers, contains 19 commodities. We aim to gain exposure to at least 50 commodities. To give some examples of commodities missed out by the DJUBS index which we believe are important are:
Moreover, the major indices focus on US-traded commodity futures 16 of the 19 commodity futures tracked in the DJ UBS index are based on We believe that this approach to broadening the commodity universe provides more opportunities to boost returns but also to lower risk. Unlike equity and bond markets, commodities have low correlations with one another. Simply put, there is little reason for lead prices to be correlated to soybeans, which cannot be said for major companies within the large capitalisation equity indices. Commodity Indices Use The Commodity Future Nearest To Delivery This means that passive indices may miss opportunities when current prices are stable but longer-dated prices are rising. If we take aluminum as an example, prices for delivery in the longer term (more than two years ahead) have risen faster (or fallen less) than short-term prices (for delivery in 3 months) in 53% of months since 1993.[ii] In some cases, while current demand may be amply covered by existing stocks, the balance between longterm supply and demand may be changing significantly, which pushes up longer dated prices. Passive indices will miss these opportunities. Most Trackers Are Backed By Notes, Not Commodity Futures Most commodity trackers are backed by swaps and medium term notes, rather than commodity futures, exposing investors to a degree of counterparty risk (such as a bank). However, some commodities backed by physical holdings (with low storage costs) can work well in passive investments. At present, this only applies to precious metals such as gold and silver.
|
12b-1 Fees: Who Cares When You Have ETFs?
I don’t really disagree with your outrage regarding 12b-1 fees, Matt, but I think you missed a bigger point.SEC Punts On 12b-1 Fees
Your article today on 12b-1 fees is way too soft on the Securities and Exchange Commission, Olly.-
Financials ETF Joins Global X Brazil Lineup
July 29, 2010 10:39 am -
Nuveen Still Plans Commodities ETF
July 26, 2010 4:24 pm -
ETF Newcomer Files For 5 New Funds
July 26, 2010 12:51 pm -
Van Eck Ups Stakes With Emerging Debt ETF
July 23, 2010 11:18 am -
Global X Debuts First Lithium ETF
July 23, 2010 12:00 am
|
|
|
|

Previous Page


